The First Age of Nuclear Innovation
In the wake of the Second World War, as humanity grappled with both the terrors and the promises unlocked by the atom, a second, quieter revolution was brewing in the laboratories of Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Here, away from the bomb factories and arms races, scientists like Alvin Weinberg envisioned a radically different future. One where nuclear energy would not only power cities, but do so cleanly, safely, and almost inexhaustibly.
Their brainchild was the Molten Salt Reactor (MSR), a system that used liquid salts both as fuel and coolant, sidestepping the dangers that plagued conventional solid-fueled reactors.
In 1965, the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) flickered to life, running not on uranium-235, the lifeblood of bombs and reactors, but on uranium-233, bred from thorium.
Here was a technology that promised not just to harness the atom, but to tame it. Eliminating the risk of catastrophic meltdown, minimizing long-lived waste, and offering a path to truly sustainable energy.
Thorium, the silvery metal named after the Norse god of thunder, is staggeringly abundant. Three to four times as plentiful in Earth's crust as uranium.
On its own, thorium-232 is inert, incapable of sustaining a chain reaction. But bathe it in neutrons, and it transforms. First into protactinium-233, and then into uranium-233, a fissile material capable of driving reactors with remarkable efficiency.
In theory, a thorium reactor could breed just enough new fuel to sustain itself indefinitely. In practice, the MSRE showed that such reactors could operate safely, with the molten salt solidifying naturally in case of an accident. An elegant, passive shutdown mechanism that traditional solid-fuel reactors could only dream of.
Yet, at the height of this promise, the thread was cut.
Lewis Strauss and the “Atoms for Peace” Vision
As chairman of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) from 1953 to 1958, Lewis Strauss was a fierce advocate for nuclear energy as a symbol of American power and prosperity.
He pushed the famous "Atoms for Peace" program, which promoted the spread of civilian nuclear technology abroad, but crucially, it was mostly uranium-based light water reactor (LWR) technology.
Strauss believed nuclear energy would become so cheap and abundant it would be "too cheap to meter" (a famous quote often used against him later).
Strauss's Deep Ties to Uranium and Plutonium Infrastructure
The U.S. military establishment was deeply invested in uranium and plutonium because of their direct connection to nuclear weapons.
Under Strauss, the AEC expanded heavy water reactors and breeder reactor programs, particularly the liquid metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) concept a reactor designed to breed plutonium from uranium-238.
By locking America into uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing infrastructure, Strauss and his AEC colleagues narrowed the field for alternative fuels like thorium.
Fallout after Strauss
Strauss resigned in 1958 after a failed Senate confirmation for Secretary of Commerce (he was unpopular politically).
After he left, his uranium/plutonium-oriented legacy persisted in the AEC bureaucracy.
By the time Alvin Weinberg and the Oak Ridge team were showcasing molten salt and thorium systems in the 1960s, the U.S. nuclear establishment had already heavily invested financially and politically in uranium and fast breeder reactor pathways.
Milton Shaw and the Final Blow
In the late 1960s, Milton Shaw, who headed the AEC's Reactor Development Division, made the active decision to cut funding for MSRs in favor of liquid metal fast breeders.
Shaw was a protege of Admiral Hyman Rickover (father of the nuclear Navy) and shared the view that only fast breeder reactors had strategic value, because they could produce massive amounts of plutonium for weapons if needed.
Shaw and the AEC didn't necessarily "hate" thorium. They just viewed it as commercially unscalable and militarily irrelevant compared to plutonium breeding.
Thus, when the molten salt reactor was quietly shut down in 1973, it wasn’t because it failed scientifically. It was because it had lost a political-economic race that Strauss’s era had already rigged decades earlier.
In a decision that would haunt the future, the molten salt reactor program was shelved. Thorium, so rich in potential, was left to gather dust just as the world’s energy needs began to climb inexorably.
A Second Chance
As the 21st century unfolds under the twin pressures of climate crisis and surging global energy demand, thorium is reemerging. Not as a relic, but as a solution whose time has finally come.
The energy matrix is shifting. Solar and wind have proven their worth, but their intermittency leaves grids vulnerable. Batteries offer a partial fix, but scale and cost remain limiting factors. What the world needs is abundant, reliable, dispatchable power. And here, molten salt reactors shine.
Operating at much higher thermal efficiencies than light water reactors (up to 45% compared to 33%), capable of air-cooling without vast water resources, and inherently safer by design, MSRs are uniquely suited for the coming century.
Thorium’s attributes, its abundance, its proliferation resistance, and its compatibility with molten salt designs, make it the obvious fuel for this renaissance.
Today, a new generation of companies and countries is racing to revive the dream:
China, by far the most aggressive, has poured state-level resources into thorium MSRs.
Canada’s Terrestrial Energy and Moltex Energy are pushing molten salt-based SMRs (Small Modular Reactors) through regulatory pipelines.
The United States, home of the original vision, sees private startups like Flibe Energy and Natura Resources struggling against outdated regulatory frameworks.
India, sitting atop the world’s largest thorium reserves, maintains a long-term thorium research program with its own strategic ambitions.
Norway’s Thor Energy is testing thorium fuels in conventional reactors, hedging bets on hybrid designs.
But for all this global activity, no one moves with the singular purpose, scale, and statecraft of China.
A Long Game in the Gobi
In 2011, the Chinese Academy of Sciences launched the Thorium Molten Salt Reactor (TMSR) program with a budget of roughly $444 million—a declaration of intent not just to explore, but to master the technology.
Their flagship, the TMSR-LF1, a modest-looking 2 MW thermal reactor tucked into the sands of Wuwei, the Gobi Desert, quietly achieved criticality on October 11, 2023. By June 2024, it was operating at full power, a world-first for thorium molten salt reactors since the MSRE shutdown half a century ago.
But it wasn’t just criticality that mattered. Chinese scientists accomplished something even the MSRE never did. They reloaded the reactor on the fly, with the core still operating, proving that liquid-fueled MSRs could sustain continuous thorium breeding cycles without shutdowns.
In October 2024, the detection of protactinium-233 confirmed successful breeding. A monumental step toward closing the thorium fuel cycle.
The TMSR-LF1 runs on a mixture of thorium and low-enriched uranium (under 20% U-235), dissolved in fluoride-based molten salt (FLiBe).
It operates at atmospheric pressure, slashing the risks of pressure-driven accidents, and uses air-cooling, sidestepping the massive water demands that cripple many traditional reactors.
And it’s tiny, barely 10 feet tall. A module that could be dropped into deserts, islands, even mobile platforms. China’s plans are bold:
A 60 MW scaled-up version by 2029, generating 10 MW of electricity, enough for industrial hubs or hydrogen production.
Deployment across western China’s sparsely populated regions.
Export to Belt and Road Initiative countries, offering clean energy where the West still dithers.
Even exploration into thorium-powered maritime shipping—zero-emission container fleets.
China didn’t start from scratch. Their scientists mined declassified Oak Ridge papers like archaeological treasures, reviving abandoned American research and updating it with modern materials science and engineering. As chief scientist Xu Hongjie put it:
“The U.S. left its research publicly available, waiting for the right successor. We were that successor.”
Today, China's thorium reserves, estimated at 280,000 tons, promise potential energy independence for millennia, if the country’s political will holds.
America’s Strategic Blind Spot
Meanwhile, the United States, the birthplace of molten salt reactor technology, sleeps.
Private efforts exist. Flibe Energy pushes forward, as does Natura Resources, which secured a construction permit for a 1 MW MSR at Abilene Christian University. But these are isolated embers, not a coordinated blaze.
There is no unified national strategy for thorium. No "Manhattan Project" for molten salts.
Instead, innovation is throttled by a regulatory system built for the 1960s. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), originally designed for solid-fueled light water reactors, demands exhaustive, expensive licensing procedures that can take a decade or more and consume hundreds of millions in compliance costs before a watt is ever produced.
China built and activated TMSR-LF1 in under ten years. In the U.S., that same timeline could barely get a prototype through initial approval stages.
The result is not just technological stagnation, its geopolitical risk. Energy abundance is the keystone of industrial competitiveness. Cheap, clean power unlocks manufacturing, AI computation, desalination, agriculture, even defense logistics.
Thorium MSRs could supply this abundance, but if America continues to strangle its own innovation, it will hand the future to its rivals. Energy policy is not an academic debate. It is national strategy.
Challenges on the Road Ahead
No technology is perfect, and thorium MSRs have their own hard engineering problems:
Corrosion at high temperatures: molten salts are chemically aggressive, demanding exotic alloys like Hastelloy-N or Inconel 617.
Neutron embrittlement: over time, materials degrade under intense neutron bombardment.
Tritium leakage: lithium-based salts can generate radioactive tritium, requiring sophisticated containment.
Proliferation risks: while uranium-233 is much harder to weaponize than plutonium, it is not impossible.
Each of these challenges is real, but none are fatal. With sufficient investment in materials science, systems engineering, and policy innovation, they can be overcome. China’s TMSR-LF1 is already proving that point.
Abundance or Decline
The world does not need incrementalism. It needs audacity.
The molten salt thorium reactor is not just a cleaner nuclear reactor. It is an energy system designed from the ground up to avoid the sins of its predecessors. Meltdown risks, weapons proliferation, chronic waste buildup.
It is a technology suited for an age of global climate constraint, energy-hungry AI industries, and crumbling fossil fuel geopolitics.
If the U.S. acts decisively, streamlining regulations, funding public-private reactor projects, reeducating a generation of nuclear engineers, there is still time to reclaim leadership.
If not, the center of global energy innovation will drift inexorably toward Beijing.
It’s frustrating being part of the generation that are not learning from the mistakes of their forebears.
It’s frustrating being part of a generation of people who would rather live a comfortable life, than one predicating on securing the future for their children (if they even want any).
And its frustrating seeing China push forward time and again in cutting edge technologies, while we lag behind due to continuous own-goals.
This essay is a call to action that we all need to do better. Expect better. Demand better. Of ourselves, our leaders, and our elected officials.
So much of what is said these days is narrative spin to see who gets to be king of the city someone else built.
Enough is enough. It’s time to act.
Sources:
Tremendous and very informative article. The issue will be the modern Victorians in our society that want their clean energy, while keying Teslas and fearing hidden magically fields from underground electrical cables. The internet is wonderful. Unfortunately it also allows horrible misinformation to spread. After all, we all know those “vapors” from Edison’s incandescent lamps are deadly.